History of Automatic Control System
The science that has shaped our future 
(from Early Ages to Now,  with a Gallery)

 

Dr. Ebrahim.  A.  Al-Gallaf  
P. O. Box  13184
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
College of Engineering
University of Bahrain
Bahrain
email : ebrgallaf@eng.uob.bh
 
(this page is updated from time to time).

(Harry Nyquist Diploma from Austin Scholl of Commence)
 

Brief history of Automatic Control by (years)

1868  first article of control ‘on governor’s’ –by Maxwell
1877  Routh stability criterien
1892  Liapunov stability condition
1895  Hurwitz stability condition
1932  Nyquist
1945  Bode 
1947  Nichols
1948  Root locus
1949  Wiener optimal control research
1955  Kalman filter and controlbility observability analysis
1956  Artificial Intelligence
1957  Bellman optimal and adaptive control 
1962  Pontryagin optimal control
1965  Fuzzy set
1972  Vidyasagar multi-variable optimal control and Robust control
1981  Doyle Robust control theory
1990  Neuro-Fuzzy
A brief history of feedback control
Reprinted by permission from Chapter 1: Introduction to Modern Control Theory, in: F.L. Lewis, Applied Optimal Control and Estimation, Prentice-Hall, 1992.
 
History of Automatic Control
History of Automatic Control 1996
History of Automatic Control 1996.   By  Karl Johan Astrom.
Control Engineering books from the 1940s and 1950s
 
The McGraw-Hill Series on Control Systems Engineering 1956-1963
 
 
IEEE Control Systems Society History Committee.
 
A Brief History Automatic Control
 
History of Automatic Control
 
Hurwitz Memorial Lecture Series
 
On the History of Control (A Message from Guest  Editor ( by :  Linda G. Bushnell) , IEEE  Article
 
A Brief History of Automatic Control  ( by :  Stuar Bennett ),  IEEE Control Magazine  Article
 
Optimal Control -  1950 to 1985  (by :  Arthur E. Bryson  Jr.)
 
Early Developments in Nonlinear Control (by :  Derek P.  Atherton)
 
Adaptive Control Around 1960 (by :  Karl J. Astrom)
 
The Evolution of Systems Analysis and Control :  A Personal Perspective (by : Lotfi A. Zadeh),  IEEE  Control Magazine Article.
 
Filtering and Stochastic Control :  A Historical Perspective.  (by:  Sanjoy K. Mitter),  IEEE  Control Magazine Article.
 
Input-Output Feedback Stability and Robustness,  1959-85. (by: George Zames), IEEE Control Magazine Article.
 
Stability:  The Common Thread in the Evolution of Feedback Control (by: Anthony N.  Michel),  IEEE Control Magazine Article.
 
Governors and Early Stability Theory, Maxwell-Routh,  Vyshnegradskii Hurwitz,  and  Lyapunov. (by : K. J. Astrom)
 
Lyapunov : From Infancy to Potency,  (by: Dennis  S.  Bernstein).

 

Control History Books

A History of Control Engineering, 1930-1955,   By Stuart Bennett,  Institution of Engineering and Technology,   IET - Publisher

Moving from Practice to Theory: Automatic Control after World War II, Sarah Bergbreiter, University of California, Berkeley

A brief history of feedback Control, F. L. Lewis, Applied Optimal Control and Estimation, 1992,  Prentice Hall.

Nyquist and His Seminal Papers, by Karl Johan Åström, ASME Nyquist Lecture 2005.  ( Look at this Lecture)

 

 

Aleksandr Mikhailovich Lyapunov

Aleksandr Mikhailovich Lyapunov (Александр Михайлович Ляпунов) (June 6, 1857 November 3, 1918, all new style) was a Russian mathematician, mechanician and physicist.   Sometimes his name is also written as Ljapunov, Liapunov or Ljapunow, and often improperly pronounced 'la-yapunov'. 

His work in the field of differential equations, potential theory, the stability of systems and probability theory is very important. His main preoccupations were the stability of equilibria and the motion of mechanical systems, the model theory for the stability of uniform turbulent liquid, and particles under the influence of gravity. His work in the field of mathematical physics was very important for subsequent advances of this field. His work from 1898 About some questions, connected with Dirichlet's tasks (О некоторых вопросах, связанных с задачей Дирихле) contains a study of the properties of potential around charges and dipoles, continuously distributed along any surface. His work in this field is in close connection with the work of Steklov. Lyapunov developed many important approximative methods. His methods, today named Lyapunov methods, which he developed in 1899, make it possible to define the stability of sets of ordinary differential equations. He elaborated the modern rigorous theory of the stability of a system, and the motion of a mechanical system on the basis of a finite number of parameters. In probability theory, he generalised the works of Chebyshev and Markov, and he finally proved the Central limit theorem using more common conditions than his forerunners. The method he used for the proof is today one of the foundations of probability theory. From 1899 to 1902 he was a head of Kharkov mathematical society and an editor of his News. On the December 2, 1900 he was elected as a corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and on the October 6, 1901 as a fully entitled member of the Academy in the field of applied mathematics.

With his researches on celestial mechanics, he opened a new page in the history of global science, and showed the inaccuracy in the knowledge of several foreign scientists. In 1908 he participated at the 4th Mathematical congress in Rome. At this time he took part in the publication of Euler's selected works, and he was an editor of the 18th and 19th part of this miscellany. By the end of June 1917, he went with his wife, who was seriously ill, to his brother Boris in Odessa, Russia (now Ukraine). His wife's impending death, his own partial blindness, and the generally bad conditions for life, all contributed to his anxiety. In spite of this he delivered his last lecture about the form of celestial bodies at the invitation of the Department of Physics and Mathematics at Odessa. On October 31 his wife died, and on the same day he shot himself. He then lay unconscious for a few days till his death.

He usually worked four to five hours at night, and many times even the whole night. Once or twice he visited the theatre, or went to some concert. He had many students. But for the few who really knew him, Lyapunov was a rather raptured man. He had a lean figure, outwardly he acted pretty rude, otherwise he had a hot-blooded and sensitive temper. He was an honorary member of many universities, an external member of the Academy in Rome and a corresponding member of the Academy of Sciences in Paris.

His paper "problème générale de la stabilité du mouvement" (1892) (in French) marks the beginning of stability theory.   (Resource : en.wikipedia.org)

 

James Clerk Maxwell

James Clerk Maxwell (13 June 1831 5 November 1879) was a Scottish mathematician and theoretical physicist. His most significant achievement was the development of the classical electromagnetic theory, synthesizing all previous unrelated observations, experiments and equations of electricity, magnetism and even optics into a consistent theory.[1] His set of equations—Maxwell's equations—demonstrated that electricity, magnetism and even light are all manifestations of the same phenomenon: the electromagnetic field. From that moment on, all other classical laws or equations of these disciplines became simplified cases of Maxwell's equations. Maxwell's work in electromagnetism has been called the "second great unification in physics",[2] after the first one carried out by Newton.

Maxwell demonstrated that electric and magnetic fields travel through space in the form of waves, and at the constant speed of light. Finally, in 1864 Maxwell wrote A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field where he first proposed that light was in fact undulations in the same medium that is the cause of electric and magnetic phenomena. His work in producing a unified model of electromagnetism is considered to be one of the greatest advances in physics.

Maxwell also developed the Maxwell distribution, a statistical means to describe aspects of the kinetic theory of gases. These two discoveries helped usher in the era of modern physics, laying the foundation for future work in such fields as special relativity and quantum mechanics. He is also known for creating the first true colour photograph in 1861.

Maxwell is considered by many physicists to be the nineteenth century scientist with the greatest influence on twentieth century physics. His contributions to the science are considered by many to be of the same magnitude as those of Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein.[3] In 1931, on the centennial of Maxwell's birthday, Einstein himself described Maxwell's work as the "most profound and the most fruitful that physics has experienced since the time of Newton."[4] Einstein kept a photograph of Maxwell on his study wall, alongside pictures of Michael Faraday and Isaac Newton.[5]      (Resource : en.wikipedia.org)

 

In mathematics, the Laplace transform is one of the best known and widely used integral transforms. It is commonly used to produce an easily solvable algebraic equation from an ordinary differential equation. It has many important applications in mathematics, physics, optics, electrical engineering, control engineering, signal processing, and probability theory.

In mathematics, it is used for solving differential and integral equations. In physics, it is used for analysis of linear time-invariant systems such as electrical circuits, harmonic oscillators, optical devices, and mechanical systems. In this analysis, the Laplace transform is often interpreted as a transformation from the time-domain, in which inputs and outputs are functions of time, to the frequency-domain, where the same inputs and outputs are functions of complex angular frequency, or radians per unit time. Given a simple mathematical or functional description of an input or output to a system, the Laplace transform provides an alternative functional description that often simplifies the process of analyzing the behavior of the system, or in synthesizing a new system based on a set of specifications.

Denoted \displaystyle\mathcal{L} \left\{f(t)\right\}, It is a linear operator on a function f(t) (original) with a real argument t (t ≥ 0) that transforms it to a function F(s) (image) with a complex argument s. This transformation is essentially bijective for the majority of practical uses; the respective pairs of f(t) and F(s) are matched in tables. The Laplace transform has the useful property that many relationships and operations over the originals f(t) correspond to simpler relationships and operations over the images F(s)[1].   (Resource : en.wikipedia.org)

 

 

Norbert Wiener

 

During and after World War II

During World War II, his work on the automatic aiming and firing of anti-aircraft guns led Wiener to communication theory and eventually to formulate cybernetics. After the war, his prominence helped MIT to recruit a research team in cognitive science, made up of researchers in neuropsychology and the mathematics and biophysics of the nervous system, including Warren Sturgis McCulloch and Walter Pitts. These men went on to make pioneering contributions to computer science and artificial intelligence. Shortly after the group was formed, Wiener broke off all contact with its members. Speculation still flourishes as to why this split occurred.

Wiener went on to break new ground in cybernetics, robotics, computer control, and automation. He shared his theories and findings with other researchers, and credited the contributions of others. These included Soviet researchers and their findings. Wiener's connections with them placed him under suspicion during the Cold War. He was a strong advocate of automation to improve the standard of living, and to overcome economic underdevelopment. His ideas became influential in India, whose government he advised during the 1950s.

Wiener declined an invitation to join the Manhattan Project. After the war, he became increasingly concerned with what he saw as political interference in scientific research, and the militarization of science. His article "A Scientist Rebels" in the January 1947 issue of The Atlantic Monthly urged scientists to consider the ethical implications of their work. After the war, he refused to accept any government funding or to work on military projects. The way Wiener's stance towards nuclear weapons and the Cold War contrasted with that of John von Neumann is the central theme of Heims (1980).    (Resource : en.wikipedia.org)

 

 

The Gallery  (thanks to :   The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)

 

 

 

         
(Resource : en.wikipedia.org)

     

            Lyapunov               Maxwell's                   Nyquist                    Routh                   Kalman            Pierre-Simon Laplace

 

Norbert Wiener

 

This series will be followed up ....  just come and visit once more ...


          University  of  Bahrain   Sunday, June 14, 2009,    Back  to  my  homepage